ETZIONI VERSUS BECKER - DO MORAL SENTIMENTS DIFFER FROM ORDINARY TASTES

Authors
Citation
El. Khalil, ETZIONI VERSUS BECKER - DO MORAL SENTIMENTS DIFFER FROM ORDINARY TASTES, Economist, 145(4), 1997, pp. 491-520
Citations number
76
Journal title
ISSN journal
0013063X
Volume
145
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
491 - 520
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-063X(1997)145:4<491:EVB-DM>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
There are two competing definitions of economics. One, exemplified in Etzioni's work, stipulates that economics is the study of one kind of ends, the pursuit of material benefits (welfare). This definition enta ils that material ends are incommensurable with moral ends. The other. expressed in Becker's work, registers that economics is the analysis of one aspect of all ends, optimization. This definition implies that material and moral ends are commensurable. The paper finds that each d efinition has its own shortcomings, The paper outlines an alternative view, illustrated by the difference between gifts and grants, which pr omises to supplant the shortcomings of each definition.