In certain kinds of overlapping tasks subjects have to respond to two
stimuli (S1 and S2), presented in close succession with variable onset
asynchrony (SOA), carrying out two different responses (R1 and R2). W
hen responding to S1 is given priority over S2 processing, reaction ti
me (RT) to the first stimulus is unaffected by SOA. However, sometimes
subjects adopt, either spontaneously or because of instruction, a dif
ferent processing strategy called grouping. In this case R1 is postpon
ed until R2 has been determined too. The present study addresses the l
ocalization of the postponed processing stage by means of the laterali
zed readiness potential (LRP). One group of subjects was instructed to
group responses and a second group was to give priority to S1 process
ing. The adherence to instructions was verified by subjects' reaction
times. In case of grouping the interval between LRP onset and overt re
action increased proportionally to the postponement caused by SOA. In
contrast, the interval between stimulus and LRP onset was unaffected b
y SOA. These findings speak against assumptions that grouping causes r
esponse activation postponement; rather, the corresponding reaction is
already selected and activated prior to postponement.