The binding of metal to humic substances is problematical. The approac
hes for studying metal binding to organic matter are briefly reviewed.
Ion-selective electrodes (Cu2+ and Pb2+) were used to measure metal c
omplexation by a whole peat and an extracted humic acid (HA) fraction.
Scatchard plots and calculation of incremental formation constants we
re used to obtain values for the binding constants for the metals onto
both peat and HA. Both the peat and the humic acid had a larger maxim
um binding capacity for Pb2+ than for Cu2+ (e.g. at pH = 5 HA gave 0.1
88 mmol Cu2+ g(-1) and 0.564 mmol Pb2+ g(-1) peat gave 0.111 mmol Cu2 g(-1) and 0.391 mmol pb(2+) g(-1)). Overall, the humic acid had a lar
ger metal binding capacity, suggesting that extraction caused conforma
tional or chemical changes. The binding constants (K-1) for CU2+ incre
ased with increasing pH in both peat and humic acid, and were larger i
n the peat at any given pH (e.g. at pH = 5 HA gave log K-1 = 2.63, and
peat gave log K-1 = 4.47 for CU2+). The values for pb(2+) showed litt
le change with pH or between pear and humic acid (e.g. at pH = 5 HA ga
ve log K-1 = 3.03 and peat gave log K-1 = 3.00 for Pb2+). In the peat,
CU2+ may be more able to bind in a 2:1 stoichiometric arrangement, re
sulting in greater stability but smaller binding capacity, whereas Pb2
+ binds predominantly in a 1:1 arrangement, with more metal being boun
d less strongly. Whole peat is considered to be more appropriate than
an extracted humic acid fraction for the study of heavy metal binding
in organic soils, as this is the material with which metals introduced
into an organic soil would interact under natural conditions.