Histologic grading of meningiomas has prognostic and sometimes therape
utic implications, but diagnostic criteria for atypical meningioma are
vague, and the significance of brain invasion in the determination of
malignancy remains controversial. We reviewed our experience with 581
patients whose meningiomas were resected at Mayo Clinic during the ye
ars 1978 through 1988. All patients were followed until death or a med
ian of 9.0 years. Ten histologic parameters were assessed and compared
with recurrence-free survival. On univariate analysis, six variables
were associated with recurrence, although most were statistically sign
ificant only in the subset of patients having undergone gross total tu
mor resection. On multivariate analyses, the most significant paramete
rs were histologic brain invasion (when assessable) and maximal mitoti
c rate of at least four per 10 high-power fields (HPF). Also significa
nt were combinations of at least three of the following four parameter
s: hypercellularity, architectural sheeting, macronucleoli, and small
cell formation. Proposed grading criteria based on these findings yiel
ded 81% classic, 15% atypical, and 4% brain invasive meningiomas with
respective 5-year recurrence rates of 12%, 41%, and 56%. There was no
association between histologic grade and either extent of surgical res
ection or patient age. However, male sex was associated with high-grad
e (atypical/brain invasive) tumors. Too few frankly anaplastic meningi
omas were encountered for statistical analysis. Brain invasion and an
increased mitotic index (at least four per 10 HPF) are the most powerf
ul histologic factors prognostic for recurrence in meningiomas. We pro
pose an objective definition for atypical meningioma based on our data
. Because the difference in recurrence rates for brain invasive and at
ypical meningiomas was not statistically significant, it could not be
determined whether brain invasion alone warrants a designation of mali
gnancy. Likewise, we were unable to determine what constitutes histolo
gic anaplasia due to the rarity of such cases.