V. Pasceri et al., ROLE OF ABNORMAL PAIN SENSITIVITY AND BEHAVIORAL-FACTORS IN DETERMINING CHEST PAIN IN SYNDROME-X, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 31(1), 1998, pp. 62-66
Objectives. We sought to investigate whether patients with syndrome X
have an abnormal perception of cardiac pain, Background. Previous stud
ies have reported an increased sensitivity to potentially painful card
iac stimuli in patients with syndrome; X. However, it is not clear whe
ther this increase is due to an increased perception of pain or to an
enhanced tendency to complain, Methods. We assessed cardiac sensitivit
y to pain in 16 patients with syndrome Ii and 15 control subjects by p
erforming right atrial and ventricular pacing with increasing stimulus
intensity (1 to 10 mA) at a rate 5 to 10 beats higher than the patien
t's heart rate, False and true pacing were performed in random sequenc
e, with both patients and investigators having no knowledge of the typ
e of stimulation being administered, Results. No control subject had p
acing-induced pain; con conversely, 8 patients with syndrome X reporte
d angina during atrial pacing (50%, p < 0.01) and 15 during ventricula
r pacing (94%, p < 0.001), During atrial stimulation, both true and fa
lse pacing caused chest pain in a similar proportion of patients (50%
vs, 63%, p = 0.61), whereas during ventricular stimulation, true pacin
g caused chest pain in a higher proportion of patients (94% vs, 50%, p
< 0.05), Pain threshold and severity of pain (1 to 10 scale) were sim
ilar during true and false atrial pacing, whereas true ventricular pac
ing resulted in a lower pain threshold (mean +/- SD 3.7 +/- 3.0 vs, 7.
9 +/- 2.8 mA, p < 0.001) and a higher level of pain severity (7.3 +/-
2.7 vs, 3.1 +/- 3.5, p < 0.001) than did false pacing, Conclusions. Pa
tients with syndrome X frequently reported chest pain even in the abse
nce of cardiac stimulation, Yet, in addition to this increased tendenc
y to complain, they also exhibited a selective enhancement of ventricu
lar painful sensitivity to electrical stimulation. (C) 1998 by the Ame
rican College of Cardiology.