This paper analyzes the value maximization of regulated banks within a
moral-hazard framework. In the model, regulators monitor both the cap
ital ratio and the asset portfolio, and banks simultaneously select th
e optimum capital ratio and asset portfolio. A key assumption is that
a bank cannot expect a positive put option value once it is classified
as risky by regulators. The optimum values of the two variables depen
d on investment opportunities and charter values, as well as regulator
y parameters. The model that explicitly incorporates regulation can ex
plain various phenomena that are seemingly inconsistent with the predi
ctions of moral hazard models - for example, a positive relationship b
etween the capital ratio and the riskiness of the asset portfolio. A p
articularly interesting result is that a larger charter value results
in a higher-risk interior solution.