Mf. Mcconnell et Mc. Calver, COMPUTER-AIDED-LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION IN VETERINARY CLINICALPATHOLOGY, Comparative haematology international, 7(1), 1997, pp. 54-60
Since 1990, Murdoch University in Western Australia has offered a Mast
er of Veterinary Studies (Small Animal Medicine and Surgery) degree by
distance education to veterinarians all over Australia. Similar to th
e other units within the course, the fundamental instructional medium
of the clinical biochemistry component is print supplemented by audio
teleconferences, personal phone calls and E-mail. To resolve problems
that occurred using mutlipart written cases studies, a simple DOS-base
d computer program (CaseMaster) was developed to simulate case studies
. In 1995, 12 CaseMaster case studies were used to supplement the prin
ted material provided and provide a form of assessment for each of the
21 students enrolled in the unit. Each text file and the files requir
ed to run CaseMaster were copied by the program to a disk which was th
en mailed to the student. The files were keyed to the diskette and cou
ld not be copied. Each CaseMaster case was composed of a series of 'qu
estions' consisting of a block of text and/or laboratory data ending i
n a question. Each new question started with the answer to the previou
s question. Students could go back and look at earlier questions and t
heir own answers at any time, but they could not change their answers
once they had been completed. Students were encouraged to include ques
tions for the instructor in their answers where appropriate. The finis
hed case studies were returned to Murdoch University, the answer files
printed, comments and assessment made and the printed answers returne
d to the students with a printed copy of the case study questions. The
re was an excellent sense of interaction between most of the students
and the instructor in these case studies. At the end of the semester,
the students were sent a questionnaire and the results analysed. CaseM
aster was very well received by the students. They thought it was an e
xcellent way to learn clinical biochemistry and worth developing furth
er. The negative aspects identified by both students and the instructo
r were the large input of time required, especially in the earlier cas
es, and the limited word-processing capacity of the program.