Tc. Hsueh et al., THE IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION AND ELECTRICAL MUSCLE STIMULATION ON MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINTS, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 76(6), 1997, pp. 471-476
This study is designed to investigate the immediate effectiveness of e
lectrotherapy on myofascial trigger points of upper trapezius muscle.
Sixty patients (25 males and 35 females) who had myofascial trigger po
ints in one side of the upper trapezius muscles were studied. The invo
lved upper trapezius muscles were treated with three different methods
according to a random assignment: group A muscles (n = 18) were given
placebo treatment (control group); group B muscles (n = 20) were trea
ted with electrical nerve stimulation (ENS) therapy; and group C muscl
es (n = 22) were given electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) therapy. Th
e effectiveness of treatment was assessed by conducting three measurem
ents on each muscle before and immediately after treatment: subjective
pain intensity [(PI) with a visual analog scale], pressure pain thres
hold [(PT) with algometry], and range of motion [(ROM) with a goniomet
er] of upper trapezius muscle (lateral bending of cervical spine to th
e opposite side). When the effectiveness of treatment was compared wit
h that of the placebo group (group A), there was significant improveme
nt in PI and PT in group B (P < 0.01) but not in group C (P > 0.05). T
he improvement of ROM was significantly more in group C (P < 0.01) as
compared with that in group A or group B. When each group was divided
into two additional subgroups based on the initial PI, it was found th
at ENS could reduce PI and increase Pi significantly (P < 0.05), but-d
id not significantly (P > 0.05) improve ROM, as compared with the plac
ebo group for both subgroups. EMS could significantly (P < 0.05) impro
ve ROM, but not PT, better than the placebo groups, for either subgrou
p. It could reduce PI significantly more (P < 0.05) than placebo contr
ols only for the subgroup with mild to moderate pain, but not with sev
ere pain. For pain relief, ENS was significantly better (P < 0.05) tha
n EMS; but for the improvement of ROM, EMS was significantly better (P
< 0.05) than ENS. It is concluded that ENS is more effective for imme
diate relief of myofascial trigger point pain than EMS, and EMS has a
better effect on immediate release of muscle tightness than ENS.