Fe. Skjeldestad et al., EPIDEMIOLOGY OF REPEAT ECTOPIC PREGNANCY - A POPULATION-BASED PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY, Obstetrics and gynecology, 91(1), 1998, pp. 129-135
Objective: To study infectious pathology at index ectopic pregnancy an
d to determine what other factors predispose a woman to repeat ectopic
pregnancy. Methods: All women (n = 697) with their first (index) ecto
pic pregnancy histologically verified between January 1, 1978, and Dec
ember 31, 1993, at the only two hospitals in one Norwegian county were
eligible. Included were permanent residents of the county who were 37
years of age or younger and who had not had tubal surgery before the
index pregnancy. When the study closed on November 1, 1994, the partic
ipants had been observed prospectively for fertility events from appro
ximately 1 to 17 years. Included in the final analyses were 353 women
who had from one to five natural conceptions, for a total of 555 pregn
ancies. Chi-square test was used in univariate analysis, and the gener
alized estimating equations approach was used to analyze correlated re
sponses and covariates that changed over time. Results: Pregnancy orde
r is the stronger correlate of subsequent ectopic pregnancy. The frequ
ency of repeat ectopic pregnancy decreased by one-third for each pregn
ancy from the first to the third pregnancy. The odds of having another
ectopic pregnancy were nearly three times higher for women with a dia
gnosis of infectious pathology than for women who had no infectious pa
thology. Other correlates of repeat ectopic pregnancy include age 24 y
ears or younger at first ectopic pregnancy, history of repeat ectopic
pregnancy, initiation of infertility work-up, and conception with an i
ntrauterine device at index pregnancy. Method of surgery was not assoc
iated with repeat ectopic pregnancy. Conclusion: The most crucial repr
oductive event after first ectopic pregnancy is the first event to occ
ur. Women who have experienced two ectopic pregnancies should be consi
dered candidates for assisted reproduction.