Controversial issues relating to the pathobiology and classification o
f central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) have
plagued neuropathologists for more than 70 years Hypotheses advanced
in the mid-1920's have remained as fixed concepts in contemporary lite
rature, largely consequent to repetitious support by a small number of
neuropathologists despite a growing body of information discrediting
these ideas from neuroembryologists, oncologists, neuroscientists and
pathologists. Attention has largely focused upon PNETs arising in the
cerebellum (commonly known as medulloblastomas [MBs]), because about 8
0% of central nervous system (CNS) PNETs originate in this site. It ha
s been asserted that the 20% which do not are biologically different,
although most individuals agree that the histological features of PNET
s that occur in different sites throughout the CNS are indistinguishab
le from those growing in the cerebellum. The historical aspects of thi
s controversy are examined in the face of evidence that there is, in f
act, a unique class of CNS tumors which should appropriately be regard
ed as primitive neuroectodermal in nature. Specifically, a number of d
ifferent approaches to the problem have yielded data supporting this h
ypothesis. These approaches include the identification of patterns of
expression among a variety of cellular antigens (demonstrated by the u
se of immunopathological techniques), molecular analyses of cell lines
derived from these tumors, experimental production of PNETs and molec
ular genetic analyses. Differences of opinion among surgeons, oncologi
sts and radiotherapists are typically resolved by conducting cooperati
ve studies of patients with these tumors who are diagnosed and treated
at multiple centers.