A. Gitter et al., EFFECT OF PROSTHETIC MASS ON SWING PHASE WORK DURING ABOVE-KNEE AMPUTEE AMBULATION, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 76(2), 1997, pp. 114-121
Recent advances in prosthetic technology have resulted in prosthetic l
imbs that weigh substantially less than those previously used by amput
ees. Although one of the clinical expectations associated with lighter
limbs was that they would reduce the abnormally high metabolic cost o
f amputee ambulation, this has not be shown in oxygen consumption stud
ies. This expectation was based on previous studies of normal walking,
which showed that the greatest changes in mechanical work occurs in t
he leg during swing phase acceleration and deceleration. To better und
erstand the relationship between limb mass and mechanical work, this s
tudy assessed the effect of varying prosthetic limb masses on the sour
ces and magnitude of the mechanical work required for limb movement du
ring swing. Eight above-knee amputees were studied during over ground
walking at their self-selected speeds while wearing identical prosthet
ic limbs under three weight conditions: unweighted; 0.68 kg of added m
ass; 1.34 kg of added mass. Using inverse dynamics, the mechanical wor
k from muscle sources and joint transfer sources that was used to acce
lerate the limb forward during late stance and early swing was determi
ned and compared with the recovery of energy from the limb by hip join
t transfer to the trunk during terminal swing deceleration. With the a
ddition of 1.34 kg of mass, there was a combined increase in hip flexo
r muscle concentric work and mechanical energy transfer across the hip
joint of 5.4J, which was needed to accelerate the heavier prosthetic
limb into the swing phase. The increase in acceleration work was balan
ced by a comparable increase (5.6J) in the recovery of leg energy duri
ng terminal swing deceleration. By effectively conserving the addition
al mechanical work needed to propel a heavier limb, amputees appear to
minimize any adverse effect of prosthetic mass on the mechanical work
of walking. This may explain the absence of differences in metabolic
cost between limbs of different masses.