In his 1993 Nicod Lectures, Jerry Fodor proposed a solution to a certa
in version of the problem of 'inscrutability of reference', which prob
lem poses a challenge to a certain naturalistic, computational approac
h to cognition which Fodor has favoured. The problem is that purely in
formational accounts of an agent's mental contents cannot discriminate
meanings finely enough. Fodor proposes a strategy of solution which a
ppeals to the inferential dispositions of agents to discriminate conte
nts more finely. After a brief exposition of the problem and Fodor's b
id for solution, I employ three counterexamples to argue that Fodor's
proposal cannot succeed.