This article evaluates drop deposition data from the sides of beverage
can samplers wrapped with Kromekote(R) paper placed throughout a broa
dleaf (almond) canopy at three stages of foliage development. Some mea
sure of foliage coverage uniformity is necessary to evaluate applicati
on quality and to improve methods of aerial application. Uniformity of
coverage is found from drop data on target elements, while potential
biological effectiveness is a measure of insect mortality, and must be
either assumed or determined in the field or laboratory by biological
assessment. Data from two field studies conducted by the USDA Forest
Service at Hennigan Orchard in Chico, California, in 1985 and 1994 are
used to evaluate the amount and uniformity of spray droplet coverage
on the can samplers. A quantitative representation of coverage (called
the Relative Index) is developed to describe the drop deposition on t
he samplers and is then used to determine the spray deposition coverag
e produced by the various spray application systems tested. The overal
l performance of two types of spray systems is evaluated in terms of d
elivering spray on target at different canopy elevations, concluding:
(1) The Relative Index formula developed herein for assessing drop rec
overies on sides of beverage cans correlates data from all trials, (2.
) The placement of beverage can samplers spatially across the orchard
and at different elevations gives a good representation of the effects
of spr-a,ting the canopy in both field studies. (3.) Helicopter spray
system applications show greater uniformity of deposit on the sides o
f the beverage cans than the fixed-wing aircraft system applications.
(4.) Micronair atomizers spraying low rate produce less coverage on th
e sides of the can samplers at all elevations in the canopy than the o
ther spray systems tested in these field studies.