G. Mcdonell, SCIENTIFIC AND EVERYDAY KNOWLEDGE - TRUST AND THE POLITICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES, Social studies of science, 27(6), 1997, pp. 819-863
This paper analyzes social processes underlying relationships between
technoscientific knowledge and governmental regulatory activities in t
he context of the recent case of an Australian hazardous waste initiat
ive. It maps a nexus of the phenomenology of trust, the formation of t
echnoscientific knowledge, and the political philosophy of regulation
and the clarification of knowledge claims. It proposes that these proc
esses depend upon elemental social and political components described
by various writers in terms of 'the constitution of scientific objects
', 'the construction of scientific types', 'familiarity', the 'taken-f
or-granted', 'trust', 'justice', and other concepts. it introduces the
term 'suspended doubt' to describe a previously undifferentiated situ
ation in individual and social interaction. It concludes that democrat
ization now increasingly extends, in the political handling of environ
mental initiatives and risk in the conditions of late twentieth-centur
y capitalism, to the democratization and negotiation of knowledge clai
ms. This produces problems for representative democracy and expressed
needs for more adaptive political processes.