THE INCIDENCE OF LOW-PRESSURE URETHRA AS A FUNCTION OF PROLAPSE-REDUCING TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH MASSIVE PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (MAXIMUM DESCENT AT ALL VAGINAL SITES)
Dk. Veronikis et al., THE INCIDENCE OF LOW-PRESSURE URETHRA AS A FUNCTION OF PROLAPSE-REDUCING TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH MASSIVE PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (MAXIMUM DESCENT AT ALL VAGINAL SITES), American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 177(6), 1997, pp. 1305-1313
OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to compare several prolapse-reducing techniqu
es during urodynamic evaluation and prospectively evaluate their usefu
lness in identifying the incidence of low urethral closure pressure in
continent patients with massive prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: This preopera
tive, prospective, repeated-measures urodynamic study evaluated the ma
ximum urethral closure pressure with the use of four different techniq
ues in 30 consecutive continent patients with grade 4 prolapse at all
vaginal sites. Twenty patients with grade 0 prolapse served as the con
trol group. All patients from the pro[apse group underwent surgical tr
eatment and were followed up clinically for a minimum of 1 year. RESUL
TS: Use of the Scopette (Birchwood Laboratories, Eden Prairie, Minn.)
reduction technique to reduce the prolapse in a linear orientation dur
ing multichannel urodynamics revealed a 56% incidence of tow-pressure
urethra and an overall genuine stress urinary incontinence of 83% in p
atients with massive pelvic organ prolapse but without clinical urinar
y incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: There may be an increased indication for
sling urethropexy in patients with massive prolapse.