THE INCIDENCE OF LOW-PRESSURE URETHRA AS A FUNCTION OF PROLAPSE-REDUCING TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH MASSIVE PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (MAXIMUM DESCENT AT ALL VAGINAL SITES)

Citation
Dk. Veronikis et al., THE INCIDENCE OF LOW-PRESSURE URETHRA AS A FUNCTION OF PROLAPSE-REDUCING TECHNIQUE IN PATIENTS WITH MASSIVE PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE (MAXIMUM DESCENT AT ALL VAGINAL SITES), American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 177(6), 1997, pp. 1305-1313
Citations number
27
ISSN journal
00029378
Volume
177
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1305 - 1313
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(1997)177:6<1305:TIOLUA>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to compare several prolapse-reducing techniqu es during urodynamic evaluation and prospectively evaluate their usefu lness in identifying the incidence of low urethral closure pressure in continent patients with massive prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: This preopera tive, prospective, repeated-measures urodynamic study evaluated the ma ximum urethral closure pressure with the use of four different techniq ues in 30 consecutive continent patients with grade 4 prolapse at all vaginal sites. Twenty patients with grade 0 prolapse served as the con trol group. All patients from the pro[apse group underwent surgical tr eatment and were followed up clinically for a minimum of 1 year. RESUL TS: Use of the Scopette (Birchwood Laboratories, Eden Prairie, Minn.) reduction technique to reduce the prolapse in a linear orientation dur ing multichannel urodynamics revealed a 56% incidence of tow-pressure urethra and an overall genuine stress urinary incontinence of 83% in p atients with massive pelvic organ prolapse but without clinical urinar y incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: There may be an increased indication for sling urethropexy in patients with massive prolapse.