NULLIPAROUS ACTIVE LABOR, EPIDURAL ANALGESIA, AND CESAREAN DELIVERY FOR DYSTOCIA

Citation
Ja. Bofill et al., NULLIPAROUS ACTIVE LABOR, EPIDURAL ANALGESIA, AND CESAREAN DELIVERY FOR DYSTOCIA, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 177(6), 1997, pp. 1465-1470
Citations number
12
ISSN journal
00029378
Volume
177
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1465 - 1470
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(1997)177:6<1465:NALEAA>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on dystocia-related cesarean delivery in actively laboring nulliparou s women. STUDY DESIGN: Active labor was confirmed in nulliparous women by uterine contractions, cervical dilatation of 4 cm, effacement of 8 0%, and fetopelvic engagement. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: epidural analgesia or narcotics. A strict protocol for labor m anagement was in place. Patients recorded the level of pain at randomi zation and at hourly intervals on a visual analog scale. Elective outl et operative vaginal delivery was permitted. RESULTS: One hundred wome n were randomized. No difference in the rate of cesarean delivery for dystocia was noted between the groups (epidural 8%, narcotic 6%; p = 0 .71). No significant differences were noted in the lengths of the firs t (p = 0.54) or second (p = 0.55) stages of labor or in any other time variable. Women with epidural analgesia underwent operative vaginal d elivery more frequently (p = 0.004). Pain scores were equivalent at ra ndomization, but large differences existed at each hour thereafter. Th e number of patients randomized did not achieve prestudy estimates. A planned interim analysis of the results demonstrated that we were unli kely to find a statistically significant difference in cesarean delive ry rates in a trial of reasonable duration. CONCLUSIONS: With strict c riteria for the diagnosis of labor and with use of a rigid protocol fo r labor management, there was no increase in dystocia-related cesarean delivery with epidural analgesia.