In reviewing the transformation in East Germany differentiated local a
nd subjective viewpoints are required in order for the processes to be
understood. For this reason, an urban planner who has been active in
Leipzig for over seven years, has tried to associate her biography wit
h a significant place in East Germany. In Autumn of 1989, the second l
argest city of the GDR burst into the headlines. On the one hand, repo
rts accumulated about the desintegration of the country. At the same t
ime, the precarious situation of the city itself reached public attent
ion. In the euphoria of unification, the city was considered a future
boomtown. Concurrently, a rapid deindustrialisation as well as a subur
banisation of retail and commercial spaces was taking place. After a '
'leaden time'' in the late 1980s, in which urban planning was countere
d by a pathological process of urban development, the years of 1990-91
, when property lots began to function as an urban planning regulative
, brought about a twofold culture shock among planners. The urban expe
rience of the ''East'' was confronted with the urban concepts of the '
'West''. A positivistic orientation of renewal and modernisation was a
ccompanied by a drastic process of change in, and exploitation of, urb
an space. With receding economic activity, however, it is becoming cle
ar that despite five years of federal investments and private initiati
ves, the question remains how the city can be heedfully renewed. Befor
e the backdrop of a declining population, Leipzig is experiencing a pa
ttern of spacial redistribution consisting of simultaneous growth and
shrinkage with a suburbanisation and transformation accompanied by the
signs of social erosion. The experience of dissolution and breaking a
part is described by Richard Sennett as the end of welfare society. Su
ch processes leave their traces also on the individual and may provide
deja-vu experiences when compared with the 1980s in the GDR.