Boulding's reconstruction of macroeconomics provides a ''microfoundati
on'' based on liquidity preference theory, a balance sheet approach, a
nd a process of homeostasis. These microfoundations are consistent wit
h his aggregate theory and avoid fallacies of composition-such as the
paradox of thrift-as well as the ''adding up'' problems of marginal pr
oductivity theory. His distribution theory links income shares to the
determinants of employment and output and the conditions of equilibriu
m of saving and investment. His definitions provide clear alternatives
to the NIPA definitions adopted in ''Keynesian'' theory. He provides
an alternative view of fiscal and monetary policies that will not prov
e to be impotent in the face of the ongoing conservative counterrevolu
tion. Indeed, his theories are quite close to the modern Post-Keynesia
n understanding of ''endogenous money,'' the deficit-growth relation,
and the investment-saving connection, while his policy recommendations
are often consistent with those of Post-Keynesians.