M. Rey et al., HOW TO MANAGE THE IMMUNIZATIONS OF THE OL DER TRAVELER, Bulletin de la Societe de pathologie exotique et de ses filiales, 90(4), 1997, pp. 245-252
Along with the growth of travels, the ageing of the population multipl
ies the number of older travellers. 13 % of travellers could be at lea
st 65 years old. It is admitted that there is no upper age limit to pe
rform immunizations. Immunizations are all the more useful for older p
eople because age generally aggravates infectious diseases. With age t
he immune response decreases definitely, especially that depending on
cellular immunity as well as the humoral response, as it has been obse
rved with vaccinations against tetanus, flu pneumococcal infections an
d hepatitis B. The first series of immunizations could be more affecte
d by age than boosters. But a lot of questions still remain unanswered
. Is there a maximum age beyond which the immune response would be una
dapted to such an extent that it would be necessary to modify the immu
nization protocols as well as the periodicity of boosters? 75 years ?
80 years ? is this age the same for all individuals ? Is that a matter
of a lower level of the antibody response, or rather of a slower dela
yed response? The planning of older travellers immunizations meets ano
ther difficulty. their often vague knowledge of past immunization reco
rds and infectious diseases. One is often reduced to conjectures. Thus
men, who have served in the army since the beginning of World War ii
are supposed to have got the first series of immunization against teta
nus and diphtheria, but how can we restore their immunity (once we hav
e defined the maximum age) when boosters have been either insufficient
or missing ? Conversely for women born before 1945, who were probably
never immunized, a first series of immunization is warranted. On the
other hand, since the immunization against poliomyelitis only came int
o effect in the sixties, most older adults have never been immunized b
ut have acquired in the past a natural immunity from their contact wit
h wild polio viruses. Naturally acquired antipoliovirus immunity doesn
't seem to have decreased with age, unlike antidiphtheria and antiteta
nus immunity, as shown by recent serologic studies. Thus would a singl
e booster with inactivated polio vaccine be sufficient to reinforce th
e immunity of most older travellers who have never been immunized ? Co
nsidering these uncertainties, one could think of carrying out a serol
ogic assessment prior to establishing an immunization program, as it h
as already been recommended for the immunization against hepatitis A.
What would its feasibility be ? There are quite a lot of questions to
discuss. May this round table help define these questions and specify
which investigations would be necessary to solve them, as well as prog
ram more rationally the immunizations of the older traveller.