In this essayist paper I explore the possible benefits of placing cons
iderations of genre as more central to dialogues and debates about lan
guage arts education. I begin by discussing various strands of the gen
re instruction movement, a theoretical and pedagogical emphasis on gen
re that has emerged in part as a critique of more progressivist pedago
gies like whole language. I then move to considering a possible critic
al synthesis of whole language pedagogies and an explicit emphasis an
genre. I do so through theoretical considerations of what it means to
engage in a discourse, relying largely on some philosophical writings
(e.g., the writings of Mikhail Bakhtin). In the final sections of this
paper I turn to more empirically-grounded reflections. I consider the
ways in which one first grade teacher helped a non-middle class learn
er to engage more deeply with science discourse genres. Throughout the
paper I attempt to construct a theoretical framework that emphasizes
the responsive and agentive engagement of students working through dis
ciplinary literacies. Such a framework mediates between the emphasis i
n whole language pedagogies on the personal meaning of texts to learne
rs and the greater emphasis in genre instruction pedagogies on the rol
e of empowering social texts in affording learners access to school-ba
sed literacies.