A. Beaufort, OPERATIONALIZING THE CONCEPT OF DISCOURSE COMMUNITY - A CASE-STUDY OFONE INSTITUTIONAL SITE OF COMPOSING, Research in the teaching of English, 31(4), 1997, pp. 486-529
Scholars have employed a number of theoretical frames for interpreting
the social dynamic in acts of composing text: constructivist relation
s between writers and readers, genres as situated action, systems of g
enres, intertextuality and discourse communities. The latter has been
disputed on philosophical grounds and has not been operationalized in
concrete terms through empirical research. This study takes a systemat
ic approach to defining and operationalizing the notion of discourse c
ommunity, drawing on data from a portion of an ethnography of writing
in a workplace setting. Textual dynamics and acts of composing could b
e seen in their fully contextualized manifestations when examined at t
ile level of community practices. For example, a single genre varied i
n form and function depending on the specific discourse communities in
which it was used, and writing events took an layered meanings-some p
ractical and some symbolic-as they were viewed in relation to other co
mmunicative activities. Discourse community norms and values also esta
blished hierarchies of texts and different writing-related roles for m
embers. The data suggest the validity of discourse community as a theo
retical construct and point to the importance of anthropological appro
aches for studying sites of writing. In addition to theoretical implic
ations, there are educational implications as well. If writing were fu
lly contextualized for students and the overarching framework of disco
urse community were made explicit, writers would be aided in the neces
sary boundary crossings from one community of writing practice to anot
her.