Gl. Bullock et al., OZONATION OF A RECIRCULATING RAINBOW-TROUT CULTURE SYSTEM - I - EFFECTS ON BACTERIAL GILL DISEASE AND HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIA, Aquaculture, 158(1-2), 1997, pp. 43-55
Ozone was added to water in a recirculating rainbow trout (Oncorhynchu
s mykiss) culture system just before it entered the culture tanks in a
n attempt to reduce the numbers of heterotrophic bacteria in system wa
ter and on trout gills, and to prevent bacterial gill disease (BGD) in
newly stocked fingerlings. During four 8-week trials, ozone was added
to the system at a rate of 0.025 or 0.036-0.039 kg ozone/kg feed fed.
In the control, where no ozone was added, and in previously published
research, BGD outbreaks occurred within two weeks of stocking, and th
ese outbreaks generally required three to four chemotherapeutant treat
ments to prevent high mortality. In three of four trials where ozone w
as added to the system, BGD outbreaks were prevented without chemical
treatments, but the causative bacterium Flavobacterium branchiophilum,
still colonized gill tissue. The one ozone test where BGD outbreaks r
equired two chemical treatments coincided with a malfunction of the oz
one generator. Although ozonation did reduce BGD mortality, it failed
in all trials to produce more than a one log,, reduction in numbers of
heterotrophic bacteria in the system water or on gill tissue. Failure
of the ozone to lower numbers of heterotrophic bacteria or to prevent
the causative BGD bacterium from occurring on gills was attributed to
the short exposure time to ozone residual (35 s contact chamber) and
rapid loss of oxidation caused by levels of total suspended solids. Ra
tionale for ozone's success at preventing BGD mortalities are not full
y understood but may in part be due to improved water quality. Use of
the lower ozone dosing rate (0.025 kg ozone/kg feed) appeared to provi
de the same benefits as the higher dosing rate (0.036-0.039 kg ozone/k
g feed fed): however, the lower ozone dosing rate was less likely to p
roduce a toxic ozone residual in the culture tank and would also reduc
e ozone equipment capital and operating costs. (C) 1997 Published by E
lsevier Science B.V.