Cv. Ananth et Dg. Kleinbaum, REGRESSION-MODELS FOR ORDINAL RESPONSES - A REVIEW OF METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, International journal of epidemiology, 26(6), 1997, pp. 1323-1333
Background. Epidemiologists are often interested in estimating the ris
k of several related diseases as well as adverse outcomes, which have
a natural ordering of severity or certainty. While most investigators
choose to model several dichotomous outcomes (such as very low birthwe
ight versus normal and moderately low birthweight versus normal), this
approach does not fully utilize the available information. Several st
atistical models for ordinal responses have been proposed, but have be
en underutilized. in this paper, we describe statistical methods for m
odelling ordinal response data, and illustrate the fit of these models
to a large database from a perinatal health programme. Methods. Model
s considered here include (1) the cumulative legit model, (2) continua
tion-ratio model, (3) constrained and unconstrained partial proportion
al odds models, (4) adjacent-category legit model, (5) polytomous logi
stic model, and (6) stereotype logistic model. We illustrate and compa
re the fit of these models on a perinatal database, to study the impac
t of midline episiotomy procedure on perineal lacerations during labou
r and delivery. Finally, we provide a discussion on graphical methods
for the assessment of model assumptions and model constraints, and con
clude with a discussion on the choice of an ordinal model. The primary
focus in this paper is the formulation of ordinal models, interpretat
ion of model parameters, and their implications for epidemiological re
search. Conclusions. This paper presents a synthesized review of gener
alized linear regression models for analysing ordered responses. We re
commend that the analyst performs (i) goodness-of-fit tests and an ana
lysis of residuals, (ii) sensitivity analysis by fitting and comparing
different models, and (iii) by graphically examining the model assump
tions.