Objective: To evaluate the efficiency and tolerance of venovenous hemo
filtration, hemodiafiltration, and hemodialysis with a two-pump system
in a neonatal animal model of acute renal failure. Design: Prospectiv
e trial. Setting: Animal laboratory at a large university-affiliate me
dical center. Subjects: New Zealand white rabbits, weighing 3325 +/- 3
80 g. Interventions: Venovenous hemofiltration, hemodiafiltration, and
hemodialysis were performed in anesthetized rabbits with previous bil
ateral ureteral ligation. Measurements and Main Results: At a blood fl
ow rate of 19 +/- 0.5 mL/min, we determined hematocrit, urea, creatini
ne, and electrolyte values in brood, at the inlet and outlet of the he
mofilter, and in ultrafiltrate at the start and after 15, 30, 60, 90,
120, and 180 mins of hemofiltration (ultrafiltrate flow rate of 1.9 +/
- 0.2 mL/min), hemodiafiltration (dialysate plus ultrafiltrate flow ra
te of 16.9 +/- 0.8 mL/min), and hemodialysis (dialysate flow rate of 1
5.7 +/- 1.1 mL/min). Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and body tem
perature were monitored during the procedures. Urea and creatinine ins
tantaneous clearances were higher with hemodiafiltration (8.0 +/- 0.7
and 6.2 +/- 0.7, respectively, n = 29) and hemodialysis (6.8 +/- 1.1 a
nd 4.8 +/- 0.9, respectively, n = 31) than with hemofiltration (1.8 +/
- 0.6 and 1.9 +/- 0.4, respectively, n = 16). Initial and final weight
s, temperatures, and hematocrit, sodium, and protein blood concentrati
ons of each 180-min procedure were similar. Conclusions: Hemodiafiltra
tion had a higher urea removal rate than hemodialysis but the manageme
nt of hemodiafiltration was more cumbersome and time consuming in the
absence of a flow equalizer device. As a result, we recommend continuo
us venovenous hemodialysis as the therapy of choice.