This pilot study was carried out to determine whether converting from
a two-tier to a three-tier in-hospital trauma triage system improves t
he efficiency of emergency department (ED) care and minimizes inapprop
riate triage. Patients at an urban, Level 1 trauma centre were triaged
using either a two-tier (months 1-3; n = 197) or three-tier (months 4
-6; n = 240) trauma response system. Patients were assessed for triage
type, age, sex, injury severity score, Glasgow coma score, post-ED di
sposition, total ED time, survival, complication rate, probability of
survival and unexpected death. Comparisons were made by ANOVA table an
alysis; significance was assumed for p<0.05. Two-tier (n = 197) and th
ree-tier patients (n = 240) were matched with respect to mean age, sex
, mean injury severity score, mean Glasgow coma score, post-ED disposi
tion, survival and probability of survival. Two-tier patients were tri
aged to give 20% alerts [criteria = physiological derangement (PD) and
/or injury mechanism (MOI)] and 80% consults; three-tier patients were
triaged as 20% category I (criteria = PD), 18% category II (criteria
= MOI) and 62% consults. Total ED time decreased from two-tier categor
y I times (2.09+/-1.64 vs. 1.95+/-1.75 h; p = 0.72). Category II patie
nts (3.28+/-1.98 h; p = 0.009) spent less time in the ED than did two-
tier consults (4.36+/-2.65 h). The mean ED three-tier consult time sig
nificantly decreased as well (3.95+/-2.42 h, p = 0.008 vs. two-tier co
nsult). Complications per patient were unchanged from two-tier to thre
e-tier triage (0.17+/-0.52 vs. 0.12+/-0.48; p = 0.15). Under-triage (5
%) and over-triage (7.5%) were minimal under three-tier triage. It is
concluded that using a three-tier triage system results in an increase
in the early involvement of the trauma service while decreasing emerg
ency department time and minimizing over-triage. (C) 1997 Elsevier Sci
ence Ltd.