DISSECTION OF THE PH-DEPENDENCE OF INHIBITOR BINDING ENERGETICS FOR AN ASPARTIC PROTEASE - DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE PROTONATION STATES OF THE CATALYTIC ASPARTIC-ACID RESIDUES
D. Xie et al., DISSECTION OF THE PH-DEPENDENCE OF INHIBITOR BINDING ENERGETICS FOR AN ASPARTIC PROTEASE - DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE PROTONATION STATES OF THE CATALYTIC ASPARTIC-ACID RESIDUES, Biochemistry, 36(51), 1997, pp. 16166-16172
The catalytic activity and inhibitor binding energetics of enzymes are
often pi-I-dependent properties. Aspartic proteases comprise an impor
tant class of enzyme targets for structure-based drug design. We have
performed a complete thermodynamic study of pepstatin binding to plasm
epsin II, an aspartic proteinase found in Plasmodium falciparum, using
isothermal titration calorimetry and circular dichroism. Thermodynami
c parameters (Delta G, Delta H, Delta C-p, and Delta S) were measured
as functions of both pH and temperature, In the pH range from 4.5 to 7
.0, pepstatin binding is accompanied by proton transfer between the so
lvent and the complex. We used thermodynamic proton linkage theory to
derive both the pH-independent binding energetics for pepstatin and th
e number and pK(a), values of ionizable residues whose pK(a) values ch
ange during ligand binding. These residues were identified as the two
catalytic aspartates, with pK(a)s of 6.5 and 3.0, and His 164, with a
pK(a) of 7.5, based on the three-dimensional structure of the pepstati
n-plasmepsin IT complex. At pH 5.0, where the protease has optimum act
ivity, the proton transfer process contributes almost 40% of the total
binding free energy change and the total charge of the active-site as
partic acid residues is -1, These experimental results provide direct
measurement for the protonation states of the catalytic aspartates in
the presence of bound ligands. Comparison of the thermodynamic and str
uctural data for pepstatin binding with human cathepsin D, a lysosomal
aspartic protease that shares 35% sequence identity with plasmepsin I
T, suggests that the energetic differences between these two proteins
are due to a higher interdomain flexibility in plasmepsin II.