M. Neri et al., THE VALIDITY OF INFORMANT REPORTS IN ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF DEMENTIA - EVIDENCE FROM THE CAMDEX INTERVIEW, Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 9(1), 1998, pp. 56-62
The evaluation of a patient's mental state, overall clinical profile a
nd behavioural disturbance in the process of diagnosing dementia requi
res at least two sources of information: the patient and the informant
. Since the severity of the dementia may interfere with the subjective
perception of these disorders, it is important to evaluate the consis
tency between these two sources of information and the clinical and ps
ychometric evaluation made by the physician. Accordingly, in this stud
y five behavioural areas, derived from the semi-structured interview s
chedule provided by the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of
the Elderly (CAMDEX, i.e., Sleep, Depressed Mood, Everyday Activity, M
emory and Global Mental Functioning) have been tested on the patient a
nd his/her informant. Eighty dementia patients (mean age = 74 years) a
nd their informants participated in the study. The dementia group was
subdivided into two levels of severity according to DSM-IIIR criteria:
41 with mild dementia and 39 with moderate dementia, respectively, ma
tched for age and schooling. The rating of impairment was found to inc
rease along with the severity of dementia in all the above-mentioned a
reas, except for sleep. However, the source of information pel se sign
ificantly influenced the evaluation of memory functioning. Moreover, t
he significant interaction between the two factors considered indicate
s that memory functioning is evaluated quite differently by the patien
ts and the informants, as only in the assessment made by the latter gr
oup did the impairment increase in parallel with severity of dementia.
Finally, whereas none of the subjective measures recorded in the pati
ents were significantly correlated with their test scores, the correla
tions between the informant memory appraisals and patient test results
proved to be significant. The present findings confirm the validity o
f informant reports in assessing cognitive and memory disorders in ear
ly-stage dementia, as well as in distinguishing patients with mild fro
m those with moderate dementia.