Wh. Poewe et al., ROPINIROLE IN THE TREATMENT OF EARLY PARKINSONS-DISEASE - A 6-MONTH INTERIM-REPORT OF A 5-YEAR LEVODOPA-CONTROLLED STUDY, Movement disorders, 13(1), 1998, pp. 39-45
The efficacies of ropinirole and levodopa were compared after 6 months
of treatment in a planned interim analysis of a 5-year, double-blind,
randomized, multicenter study of patients with early Parkinson's dise
ase requiring dopaminergic therapy. The percentage of improvement in t
he Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale total motor examination sc
ore was significantly higher for levodopa (44%) than for ropinirole (3
2%). The proportion of ''responders'' (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rat
ing Scale improvement of at least 30%) did not differ between groups (
levodopa, 58%; ropinirole, 48%). There was no difference between the g
roups for improvement on the Clinical Global Impression scale in patie
nts with Hoehn and Yahr stages I, I.5, or II, but a significantly high
er proportion of patients with Hoehn and Yahr stages II.5 or III showe
d Clinical Global Impression score improvement with levodopa. Emergent
adverse events occurred in 84% of patients in both treatment groups,
the principal symptom in each group being nausea. The incidence of ser
ious adverse events was low (8% for ropinirole, 9% for levodopa). The
results suggest that ropinirole and levodopa are equally effective in
less severe Parkinson's disease; in more advanced Parkinson's disease,
levodopa is superior.