G. Atalan et al., ASSESSMENT OF URINARY-BLADDER VOLUME IN DOGS BY USE OF LINEAR ULTRASONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS, American journal of veterinary research, 59(1), 1998, pp. 10-15
Objective-To evaluate accuracy of formulas derived from linear ultraso
nographic measurements and used in human beings to assess urinary blad
der volume as a method of estimating bladder volume in dogs and to tes
t reproducibility of ultrasonographic measurements of linear bladder d
imensions. Animals-64 live dogs (for bladder volume determination) and
31 fresh canine cadavers (for ultrasonographic assessment of reproduc
ibility of measurements). Procedure-Maximal length, longitudinal and t
ransverse depth (DL and DT), and width were measured from the maximal
longitudinal and transverse images. Bladder volume was estimated, usin
g 6 formulas, and calculated volumes were compared statistically with
the actual volume obtained by catheterization, using paired nonparamet
ric tests. Reproducibility of bladder dimensions was investigated by m
easuring length, DL, DT, and width 3 times from each image of section.
Measurements of depth (DL and DT) also were compared. Results-Calcula
tions of bladder volume from linear dimensions, using a formula descri
bed for use in human beings, gave a satisfactory indication of actual
bladder volume; the median difference between actual and calculated vo
lumes was only 5 ml. Bladder volume estimations were less accurate whe
n large-volume bladders were measured. Matching between repealed measu
rements was significant (P < 0.005 for longitudinal bladder length and
P < 0.0001 for bladder depth and width). Measurements of DL and DT we
re significantly (P < 0.01) different, with DL greater than DT. Conclu
sions-Ultrasonographic assessment of bladder volume in dogs by applica
tion of the formula is sufficiently accurate for most clinical purpose
s. Clinical Relevance-Ultrasonography would be a useful method of esti
mating bladder volume in dogs with severe obstruction or dysfunctional
voiding of urine.