G. Panayotou et al., DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE SUBSTRATE PREFERENCE OF URACIL-DNA GLYCOSYLASE, The Journal of biological chemistry, 273(1), 1998, pp. 45-50
Site-directed mutants of the herpes simplex virus type 1 uracil-DNA gl
ycosylase lacking catalytic activity have been used to probe the subst
rate recognition of this highly conserved and ubiquitous class of DNA
repair enzyme utilizing surface plasmon resonance. The residues aspart
ic acid-88 and histidine-210, implicated in the catalytic mechanism of
the enzyme (Savva, R., McAuley-Hecht, K., Brown, T., and Pearl, L. (1
995) Nature 373, 487-493; Slupphaug, G., Mol, C. D., Kavli, B., Arvai,
A. S., Krokan, H. E. and Tainer, J. A. (1996) Nature 384, 87-92) were
separately mutated to asparagine to allow investigations of substrate
recognition in the absence of catalysis, The mutants were shown to be
correctly folded and to lack catalytic activity. Binding to single-an
d double-stranded oligonucleotides, with or without uracil, was monito
red by real-time biomolecular interaction analysis using surface plasm
on resonance. Both mutants exhibited comparable rates of binding and d
issociation on the same uracil-containing substrates, Interaction with
single-stranded uracil-DNA was found to be stronger than with double-
stranded uracil-DNA, and the binding to Gua:Ura mismatches was signifi
cantly stronger than that to Ade:Ura base pairs suggesting that the st
ability of the base pair determines the efficiency of interaction. Als
o, there was negligible interaction between the mutants and single- or
double-stranded DNA lacking uracil, or with DNA containing abasic sit
es, These results suggest that it is uracil in the DNA, rather than DN
A itself, that is recognized by the uracil-DNA glycosylases.