In a growing number of countries, guidelines are playing an increasing
ly important role in assuring the quality of care, Their validity depe
nds on a systematic development process and explicit links between rec
ommendations and underlying evidence, Their role in aiding clinical de
cision making depends on their developers identifying the key decision
s and their consequences; gathering the relevant evidence on the risks
and costs of alternative decisions; and presenting the appropriate ev
idence to make each key decision in a simple and accessible format, po
ssibly electronic, Decision analysis is a potentially powerful tool fo
r clarifying clinical decisions and involving patients directly in the
process but its routine use in guidelines is complex and has yet to b
e fully evaluated, Duplication of guidelines can be avoided by apprais
ing and adapting existing guidelines in local contexts. There is very
little evidence available about the impact of guidelines on the doctor
-patient relationship. They might have a potentially deleterious effec
t, but the combination of explicit guidelines eliciting patient prefer
ences and information technology might redress the balance by increasi
ng the role of patients themselves. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.