We examined the patterns of joint kinematics and torques in two kinds
of sagittal plane reaching movements. One consisted of movements from
a fixed initial position with the arm partially outstretched, to diffe
rent targets, equidistant from the initial position and located accord
ing to the hours of a clock. The other series added movements from dif
ferent initial positions and directions and >40-80 cm distances. Dynam
ic muscle torque was calculated by inverse dynamic equations with the
gravitational components removed. In making movements in almost every
direction, the dynamic components of the muscle torques at both the el
bow and shoulder were related almost linearly to each other. Both were
similarly shaped, biphasic, almost synchronous and symmetrical pulses
. These findings are consistent with our previously reported observati
ons, which we termed a linear synergy. The relative scaling of the two
joint torques changes continuously and regularly with movement direct
ion. This was confirmed by calculating a vector defined by the dynamic
components of the shoulder and elbow torques. The Vector rotates smoo
thly about an ellipse in intrinsic, joint torque space as the directio
n of hand motion rotates about a circle in extrinsic Cartesian space.
This confirms a second implication of linear synergy that the scaling
constant between the linearly related joint torques is directionally d
ependent. Multiple linear regression showed that the torque at each jo
int scales as a simple linear function of the angular displacement at
both joints, in spite of the complex nonlinear dynamics of multijoint
movement. The coefficients of this function are independent of the ini
tial arm position and movement distance and are the same for all subje
cts. This is an unanticipated finding. We discuss these observations i
n terms of the hypothesis that voluntary, multiple degrees of freedom,
rapid reaching movements may use rule-based, feed-forward control of
dynamic joint torque. Rule-based control of joint torque with separate
dynamic and static controllers is an alternative to models such as th
ose based on the equilibrium point hypotheses that rely on a positiona
lly based controller to produce both dynamic and static torque compone
nts. It is also an alternative to feed-forward models that directly so
lve the problems of inverse dynamics. Our experimental findings are no
t necessarily incompatible with any of the alternative models, but the
y describe new, additional findings for which we need to account. The
rules are chosen by the nervous system according to features of the ki
nematic task to couple muscle contraction at the shoulder and elbow in
a linear synergy. Speed and load control preserves the relative magni
tudes of the dynamic torques while directional control is accomplished
by modulating them in a differential manner. This control system oper
ates in parallel with a positional control system that solves the prob
lems of postural stability.