M. Gayraud et al., TREATMENT OF GOOD-PROGNOSIS POLYARTERITIS-NODOSA AND CHURG-STRAUSS-SYNDROME - COMPARISON OF STEROIDS AND ORAL OR PULSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN 25 PATIENTS, British journal of rheumatology, 36(12), 1997, pp. 1290-1297
Twenty-five patients with good-prognosis polyarteritis nodosa or Churg
-Strauss syndrome entered a prospective, randomized, multicentre study
comparing two treatments: either oral corticosteroids and oral cyclop
hosphamide (CY; 2 mg/kg/day) for yr (group A), or oral corticosteroids
and monthly i.v. CY pulses (0.6 g/m(2)) (group B) for 1 yr. The objec
tive was to determine the optimal CY regimen. Judgement criteria were
the efficacy of the treatment in controlling the disease and the devel
opment of side-effects. Among the 25 patients who could be analysed, c
omplete recovery was achieved with the experimental treatment in 9/12
patients in group A and 10/13 patients in group B. Two patients in eac
h group relapsed after the end of therapy and were well controlled by
corticosteroids or other drugs. One failure occurred in each group. Th
e mean follow-up was 60.8 +/- 14.5 months after the beginning of the t
reatment. Side-effects associated with the administration of CY and st
eroids were noted 27 times in group A vs 14 times in group B (not sign
ificant). The oldest patient in these series (group B) died of pneumon
ia. No superiority in terms of efficacy could be established between t
he two regimens; however, the number of patients included was too smal
l to conclude definitively. Toxic side-effects were significantly more
frequent in women (P<0.02). The high number of adverse effects leads
us to recommend pulse over oral CY and an overall lowering of the dose
s of immunosuppression.