The use of(costly) growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children is
often justified by the assumption that short stature considerably redu
ces quality of life in adults. We tested this assumption in 5 groups o
f short adults: 25 patients with isolated GH deficiency; 17 male patie
nts with childhood onset renal failure; 25 women with Turner syndrome
and 26 patients who were presented as a child to a paediatrician for i
diopathic short stature. A group of 44 short individuals with presumab
ly idiopathic short stature, who had not been presented to a paediatri
cian for short stature, was sampled from the general population ('norm
al shorts'). We measured quality of life in terms of socio-economic va
riables, the Nottingham Health Profile and time trade-off. The mean he
ight of most groups was close to the 3rd percentile. The chance of hav
ing a partner was low for all groups, except for the normal shorts. Pr
oblems with job application were only reported in Turner syndrome. The
scores on the Nottingham Health Profile were all within the normal ra
nge, but GH-deficient adults had a higher score on the domain energy t
han normal shorts. Women with Turner syndrome, individuals with renal
failure, and these with idiopathic short stature had a wish to be tall
er, with an estimated reduction in quality of life of 2-4% (time trade
-off). As the normal shorts did not show any sign of a reduced quality
of life, we falsify the assumption of a direct relation between short
stature and quality of life. The complaints of patients with idiopath
ic short stature around the 3rd percentile seem to be the result of un
successful coping strategies.