Jf. Stastny et al., ANOTHER QUALITY ASSURANCE ISSUE - AMENDED REPORTS - WHAT DO WE REALLYKNOW ABOUT THEM, Diagnostic cytopathology, 18(1), 1998, pp. 67-70
The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) of 1988 requires
that if a cytology/histology discrepancy is discovered which is signif
icant and affects patient care, an amended report should be issued (Cl
inical Laboratory Improvement Amendments, Fed Reg 1992;57:7169). Since
little is known about such amended reports, a survey was developed to
assess how individuals handle discrepancies. The Quality Assurance Ta
sk Force from the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology created a surv
ey to assess these methods and sent it to all of their members. Fifty-
one individuals responded to the survey. Methods vary widely among ins
titutions. On average, 107 cytologic/histologic correlations are perfo
rmed each month with the discovery of approximately 2 major and II min
or discrepancies. Thirty-nine responders utilize written amended repor
ts and telephone clinicians when a major discrepancy is found. Thirty-
eight individuals indicated that their place of employment has a writt
en policy concerning discrepancies. Time spent in quality assurance is
sues averaged 8 hr per wk for cytotechnologists and 3 hr per wk for pa
thologists. Although amended reports are required when significant dis
crepancies are revealed, a standard practice does not exist. (C) 1998
Wiley-Liss, Inc.