Models of the spray forming process from different groups shaw reasona
ble agreement with each other and with the real process, Use of these
models has provided considerable insight into the several complex proc
esses involved in spray forming; in addition, the models allow designe
d experiments to provide further insight into the process. In the work
described it has been shown that the modeled fraction of liquid in th
e spray f(l)(s) appears to be an appropriate control parameter for spr
ay The differences forming. Sticking efficiency and porosity have been
found to correlate well with f(l)(s). The differences found in the op
timum value of the fraction of liquid in the spray for billets (0.3) a
nd tubes (0.5-0.6) indicate, however, that the actual control paramete
r may be the fraction liquid in the deposit, f(l)(d) on the surface un
der the spray. The need for improved modeling, particularly of the ful
l thermal profiles in complex geometries such as spray deposited tubes
, is discussed as is the value of improved process diagnostic tools fo
r direct experimental measurement of such features as droplet sizes an
d velocities, and the deposit temperatures in actual spray forming pro
cesses.