THE MADURAI INTRAOCULAR-LENS STUDY - I - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING COMPLICATIONS AND VISION OUTCOMES OF INTRACAPSULAR CATARACT-EXTRACTION AND EXTRACAPSULAR CATARACT-EXTRACTION WITH POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR-LENS
Gn. Natchiar et al., THE MADURAI INTRAOCULAR-LENS STUDY - I - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING COMPLICATIONS AND VISION OUTCOMES OF INTRACAPSULAR CATARACT-EXTRACTION AND EXTRACAPSULAR CATARACT-EXTRACTION WITH POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR-LENS, American journal of ophthalmology, 125(1), 1998, pp. 1-13
PURPOSE: The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study (MIOLS) was designed to co
mpare safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes after either intr
acapsular cataract extraction with aphakic glasses (ICCE-AG) or extrac
apsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (E
CCE/PC-IOL). METHODS: The Madurai Intraocular Lens Study was a nonmask
ed randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at a single hospital
. Thirty four hundred patients with age-related cataracts and having a
best corrected visual acuity less than or equal to 20/120 in the bett
er eye were randomly assigned to either of the two cataract operative
procedures. The main clinical outcomes were safety (complication rates
) and efficacy (best-corrected visual acuity at 1 year equal to or bet
ter than 20/40). In addition, a subset of 1,700 trial participants rec
eived questionnaires before surgery, at 6 months after surgery, and at
1 year after surgery to measure visual functioning and vision related
quality of life. RESULTS: Details of study design, study organization
, clinical and quality of life outcome variables, sample size calculat
ions, patient eligibility criteria and recruitment, randomization and
masking, participant flow, adherence to follow-up, quality assurance,
and statistical methods are presented. CONCLUSIONS: The Madurai Intrao
cular Lens Study has sufficient power to detect clinically significant
differences between the treatment options. There were no statisticall
y significant differences between the two treatment groups for any of
the major study variables at baseline. A high level of quality assuran
ce was maintained throughout the October 1993 to June 1996 study perio
d. The results should be applicable to all settings where the requisit
e expertise and resources are present.