Guided by gendered organization theory and organizational frame analys
is, this study explores officials' accounts of gender and rape process
ing work. The data are from qualitative interviews with 47 Florida off
icials who process rape victims in law enforcement, hospital emergency
room, prosecution, and rape crisis contexts. Results indicate that ge
nder ''at the level of the group'' is a fluid cultural resource that o
fficials use in contradictory ways (Thorne 1993). Five Bender frame's
account for why women, men or neither are superior in processing work.
Overall, results support gendered organization theory, showing that (
a) gender and work an fused in ways that mutually reproduce each other
, lb) gender is part of official policy and practice in some organizat
ions, (c) most processing work is performed within a gendered division
of labor, and (d) processors mobilize gender informally am when polic
y or protocol say it is irrelevant. The results challenge cultural bel
iefs that women are better than men at work with rape victims. Compara
tive research is needed to document the prevalence of gender accounts,
arrangements, and policies across organizations, jobs, and genders, a
nd to assess them relative to victim and organizational outcomes.