Sk. Rigler et al., PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF GERIATRIC DEPRESSION - KEY ISSUES IN INTERPRETING THE EVIDENCE, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46(1), 1998, pp. 106-110
OBJECTIVE: A framework for critical appraisal of antidepressant trial
literature involving geriatric subjects is presented. Among older adul
ts, treatment decisions are complicated by comorbid medical and cognit
ive illness, the variable course of recovery, and the overlap of depre
ssive symptoms with other disease symptoms. Consumers of the literatur
e on competing antidepressant therapies for older adults must consider
disease and population-specific outcome assessment issues. DESIGN: An
appraisal guide, adapted for geriatric depression, is developed from
literature on methodological challenges of outcome assessment and publ
ished clinical trials comparing competing antidepressant therapies in
older subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical utility of pharmacologic tre
atment of depression can be difficult to assess because depression sca
les in current use provide an important but limited perspective on tre
atment outcome and because the scales vary in actual content and abili
ty to detect change. The use of indicators of function, independence,
and self-perceived well-being as outcomes offers additional patient re
levance and should be included. Key considerations involve (1) general
characteristics: whether the depression outcome measure is valid and
reproducible for the aged population under study, whether the outcome
measure is sensitive to treatment-related change, and whether the time
-frame of outcome assessment is appropriate for the treatment goal; (2
) cognitive impairment: how subjects with dementia are assessed, and w
hether the impact of the intervention on caregivers and healthcare sys
tems is considered as a relevant outcome; (3) pharmacologic issues: wh
ether the comparator agent is a reasonable usual-care standard in the
older adult and whether ascertainment for adverse effects is similar f
or all agents under study; and (4) broader general health status issue
s: whether functional or quality of life measures are used as outcome
indicators.