Development of validated and reliable outcome measures for spasticity
rehabilitation has been hampered by the difficulty of quantifying func
tionally important parameters such as pain, ease of care, and mobility
Nonetheless, a combination of measures designed to assess technical a
nd functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, and the cost effectivene
ss of treatment can be used together to evaluate status and track chan
ge in spasticity management, including treatment programs involving bo
tulinum toxin. While double-blind, placebo-controlled studies remain t
he gold standard for clinical testing, the single-subject design is a
useful alternative in many treatment protocols. Because no single tool
can measure the many types of changes possible with treatment, the ch
oice of assessment tools must be based on the functional changes expec
ted from the treatment. A wide range of assessment tools are criticall
y reviewed for their sensitivity reliability, validity, and ease of ad
ministration. (C) 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.