MICROSPAR DEVELOPMENT DURING EARLY MARINE BURIAL DIAGENESIS - A COMPARISON OF PLIOCENE CARBONATES FROM THE BAHAMAS WITH SILURIAN LIMESTONESFROM GOTLAND (SWEDEN)
A. Munnecke et al., MICROSPAR DEVELOPMENT DURING EARLY MARINE BURIAL DIAGENESIS - A COMPARISON OF PLIOCENE CARBONATES FROM THE BAHAMAS WITH SILURIAN LIMESTONESFROM GOTLAND (SWEDEN), Sedimentology, 44(6), 1997, pp. 977-990
Comparison of ultrastructures in Pliocene periplatform carbonates from
the Bahamas with Silurian limestones from Gotland (Sweden) reveals th
at despite the differences in primary sediment composition and age, th
ey reflect a similar mechanism of lithification. In both sequences cal
cite microspar was formed as a primary cement at an early stage of mar
ine burial diagenesis. Neither significant compression nor meteoric in
fluence are necessary for the formation of calcite microspar. A model
is proposed for the process of microsparitic cementation of fine-grain
ed aragonite needle muds comprising four stages: (1) unconsolidated, a
ragonite-dominated carbonate mud; (2) precipitation of microspar that
engulfs aragonite needles; (3) dissolution of aragonite, resulting in
pitted surfaces of the microspar crystals; and (4) slight recrystalliz
ation. Our results contradict the widespread opinion that microspar ne
cessarily is a product of secondary recrystallization of a previously
lithified micrite.