Lt. Steyaert et al., LAND-COVER MAPPING, FIRE REGENERATION, AND SCALING STUDIES IN THE CANADIAN BOREAL FOREST WITH 1 KM AVHRR AND LANDSAT TM DATA, J GEO RES-A, 102(D24), 1997, pp. 29581-29598
A multitemporal 1 km advanced very high resolution radiometer (AVHRR)
land cover analysis approach was used as the basis for regional land c
over mapping, fire disturbance-regeneration, and multiresolution land
cover scaling studies in the boreal forest ecosystem of central Canada
. The land cover classification was developed by using regional field
observations from ground and low-level aircraft transits to analyze sp
ectral-temporal clusters that were derived from an unsupervised cluste
r analysis of monthly normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) im
age composites (April-September 1992). Quantitative areal proportions
of the major boreal forest components were determined for a 821 km x 6
19 km region, ranging from the southern grasslands-boreal forest ecoto
ne to the northern boreal transitional forest. The boreal wetlands (mo
stly lowland black spruce, tamarack, mosses, fens, and bogs) occupied
approximately 33% of the region, while lakes accounted for another 13%
. Upland mixed coniferous-deciduous forests represented 23% of the eco
system. A SW-NE productivity gradient across the region is manifested
by three levels of tree stand density for both the boreal wetland coni
fer and the mixed forest classes, which are generally aligned with iso
pleths of regional growing degree days. Approximately 30% of the regio
n was directly affected by fire disturbance within the preceding 30-35
years, especially in the Canadian Shield Zone where large fire-regene
ration patterns contribute to the heterogeneous boreal landscape. Inte
rcomparisons with land cover classifications derived from 30-m Landsat
Thematic Mapper (TM) data provided important insights into the relati
ve accuracy of the 1 km AVHRR land cover classification. Primarily due
to the multitemporal NDVI image compositing process, the 1 km AVHRR l
and cover classes have an effective spatial resolution in the 3-4 km r
ange therefore fens, bogs, small water bodies, and small patches of dr
y jack pine cannot be resolved within the wet conifer mosaic. Major di
fferences in the l-km AVHRR and 30-m Landsat TM-derived land cover cla
sses are most likely due to differences in the spatial resolution of t
he data sets. In general, the 1 km AVHRR land cover classes are vegeta
tion mosaics consisting of mixed combinations of the Landsat classes.
Detailed mapping of the global boreal forest with this approach will b
enefit from algorithms for cloud screening and to atmospherically corr
ect reflectance data for both aerosol and water vapor effects. We beli
eve that this 1 km AVHRR land cover analysis provides new and useful i
nformation for regional water, energy, carbon, and trace gases studies
in BOREAS, especially given the significant spatial variability in la
nd cover type and associated biophysical land cover parameters (e.g.,
albedo, leaf area index, FPAR, and surface roughness). Multiresolution
land cover comparisons (30 m, 1 km, and 100 km grid cells) also illus
trated how heterogeneous landscape patterns are represented in land co
ver maps with differing spatial scales and provided insights on the re
quirements and challenges for parameterizing landscape heterogeneity a
s part of land surface process research.