Background and Objective. The clinical quality of oral anticoagulant t
herapy (OAT) depends on how successful physicians and patients are in
achieving and maintaining levels of anticoagulation capable of prevent
ing thromboembolic events without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic c
omplications. Concerning the patient, education and compliance are the
major problems. As for the physician, on the other hand, the manageme
nt of patients receiving OAT is a complex task that requires frequent
laboratory testing, dosage regulation, prompt diagnosis and treatment
of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. It requires educated and ski
lled personnel and a well-organized framework of services. Anticoagula
tion clinics, which provide patient education, close monitoring of pro
thrombin time and continuous clinical surveillance, may help in improv
ing the overall quality of OAT. Information sources. The authors have
been working in this field contributing, original papers. In addition,
the material examined in this article includes articles published in
the journals covered by the Science Citation index(R) and Medline(R).
State of art and Perspectives. The concept of a coordinated network of
medical services specifically devoted to the control of OAT was devel
oped in the Netherlands following the model created by the late Profes
sor Jordan, who in 1949 founded the first thrombosis center at the Uni
versity of Utrecht. Many other anticoagulant clinics were organized on
a voluntary basis in the following decades in the Netherlands. The Du
tch Federation of Thrombosis Centers was founded in 1971 and each affi
liated Center is formally recognized and supported by the central Gove
rnment. Today, there is a nation-wide system of regionally centralized
anticoagulant control for outpatients and home patients that counts a
pproximately 70 anticoagulant clinics (thrombosis centers), covering m
ore than 90% of the country. Similar global approaches to the manageme
nt of patients receiving OAT were proposed in other countries. In the
1950's, a group of internists and surgeons at the University of Michig
an, USA, developed a unit specifically devoted to the diagnosis and tr
eatment of thromboembolic disease, and proposed common strategies, tea
ching and research programs. In 1959, Sevitt and Gallagher were the fi
rst to propose a formal recognition of an anticoagulant unit in Great
Britain. Finally, the Italian Federation of Centers for the Surveillan
ce of Anticoagulant (FCSA) therapies was founded in 1989. Nowadays, It
alian anticoagulation clinics operating in the framework of the FCSA a
re still voluntary organizations which provide a specific medical serv
ice by continuously reorganizing the personnel, structures and resourc
es available to meet increasing demands. Since OAT has a profound soci
al impact, its control should not be left to the good will of dedicate
d people, but should instead represent a specific task of the public h
ealth system. The achievement of a formal recognition of federated cen
ters is essential for their growth, but the unavoidable increase of th
e expenses needed to support anticoagulation clinics is difficult to b
ear in a public care system which is currently facing a substantial re
duction of financial resources. In a fixed health care budget, a redis
tribution of existing resources is the only possible solution, but to
achieve this goal, public authorities have to be convinced that the ma
nagement of OAT in specific anticoagulation clinics is cost-effective.
A more accurate estimate of costs is needed and should be performed b
y the FCSA. Finally, the FCSA should strengthen its contacts with pati
ent organizations and other scientific associations in order to develo
p common action strategies for improving the quality of OAT. (C) 1997,
Ferrata Storti Foundation.