This is a report from the Kananaskis working group on quantitative met
hods in tumour heterogeneity, Tumour progression is currently believed
to result from genetic instability and consequent acquisition of new
genetic properties in some of the tumour cells, Cross-sectional assess
ment of genetic markers for human tumours requires quantifiable measur
es of intratumour heterogeneity for each parameter or characteristic o
bserved; the relevance of heterogeneity to tumour progression can best
be ascertained by repeated assessment along a tumour progressional ti
me Line, This paper outlines experimental and analytic considerations
that, with repeated use, should lead to a better understanding of tumo
ur heterogeneity, and hence, to improvements in patient diagnosis and
therapy, Four general principles were agreed upon at the Symposium: (1
) the concept of heterogeneity requires a quantifiable definition so t
hat it can be assessed repeatably; (2) the quantification of heterogen
eity is necessary so that testable hypotheses may be formulated and ch
ecked to determine the degree of support from observed data; (3) it is
necessary to consider (a) what is being measured, (b) what is current
ly measurable, and (c) what should be measured; and (4) the proposal o
f working models is a useful step that will assist our understanding o
f the origins and significance of heterogeneity in tumours. The proper
ties of these models should then be studied so that hypotheses may be
refined and validated. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.