T. Christensen et al., SOME DETAILS OF THE REACTION-MECHANISM OF GLUCOAMYLASE FROM ASPERGILLUS-NIGER - KINETIC AND STRUCTURAL STUDIES ON TRP52-]PHE AND TRP317-]PHE MUTANTS, European journal of biochemistry, 250(3), 1997, pp. 638-645
Presteady and steady-state kinetic results on the interactions of a wi
ld-type, and the mutant glucoamylases Trp52-->Phe and Trp317-->Phe, fr
om Aspergillus niger with maltose, maltotriose and maltotetraose have
been obtained and analyzed. The results are compared with previous one
s on the mutants, Trp120-->Phe and Glu180-->Gln, and with results obta
ined from structure energy minimization calculations based on known th
ree-dimensional structural data. All results are in accordance with a
three-step reaction model involving two steps in the substrate binding
and a rate-determining catalytic step. Trp317 and Glu180 belong to di
fferent subsites. but are placed on the same flank of the active site
(beta-flank). The Trp317-->Phe and the Glu180-->Gln mutants show almos
t identical kinetic results: weakening of the substrate binding, mainl
y caused by changes in the second reaction step, and practically no ch
ange of the catalytic rate. Structure energy minimization calculations
show that the same loss of Arg305 and Glu180 hydrogen bonds to the su
bstrate occurs in the Michaelis complexes of each of these mutants. Th
ese results indicate that important interactions of the active site ma
y be better understood from a consideration of its flanks rather than
of its subsites. The results further indicate differences in the subst
rate binding mode of maltose and of longer substrates. Trp52 and Trp12
0 each interact with the catalytic acid, Glu179, and are placed on the
flank (alpha-flank) of the active site opposite to Trp317, Arg305 and
Glu180. Also the Trp52-->Phe and Trp120-->Phe mutants show kinetic re
sults similar to each other. The catalytic rates are strongly reduced
and the substrates are bound more strongly, mainly as a result of the
formation of a more stable complex in the second reaction step. All to
gether, the substrate binding mechanism seems to involve an initial en
zyme-substrate complex, in which the beta-flank plays a minor role, ex
cept for maltose binding; this is followed by a conformational change,
in which hydrogen bends to Arg305 and Glu180 of the beta-flank are es
tablished and the correct alignment on the alpha-flank of Glu179. the
general acid catalyst, governed by its flexible interactions with Trp5
2 and Trp120, occurs.