SUCCESSFUL SPERM RETRIEVAL BY PERCUTANEOUS EPIDIDYMAL AND TESTICULAR SPERM ASPIRATION

Citation
La. Levine et Ew. Lisek, SUCCESSFUL SPERM RETRIEVAL BY PERCUTANEOUS EPIDIDYMAL AND TESTICULAR SPERM ASPIRATION, The Journal of urology, 159(2), 1998, pp. 437-440
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00225347
Volume
159
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
437 - 440
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(1998)159:2<437:SSRBPE>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous sperm as piration from the epididymis or testicle as a diagnostic technique to confirm sperm production and as a therapeutic technique to harvest spe rm for use in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Materials and Methods: We present our experience with 69 sperm aspiration procedures in men considered to have nonreconstructible obstructive azoospermia. This sh ort outpatient procedure was performed using a butterfly needle with t he patient under intravenous sedation and local anesthesia. Results: O f the 32 diagnostic aspirations 20 demonstrated mature and motile sper m, 9 maturation arrest and 3 germ cell aplasia. In 35 of 37 therapeuti c sperm aspirations (95%) adequate samples of sperm after processing ( mean of 5.4 million) were obtained. Of 24 epididymal aspirations 13 (5 4%) had sufficient residual sperm for cryopreservation of 1 to 5 vials (mean 2.5) containing an average of 170,000 sperm per vial. In the 32 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles 221 of 392 eggs (56.3%) ferti lized (2PN) and 6 resulted in ongoing pregnancies (21.4% per transfer) . There have been no acute or chronic complications in this patient po pulation. Ten men underwent a second successful aspiration procedure f or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and 3 underwent a third aspiration without added difficulty. Conclusions: Percutaneous epididymal or tes tis sperm aspiration is a minimally invasive sperm retrieval technique and appears to be an effective alternative to microsurgical epididyma l sperm aspiration, which is more invasive, costly and technically dif ficult.