SUBSPECIALIZATION, RECRUITMENT AND RETIREMENT TRENDS OF AMERICAN UROLOGISTS

Citation
Wf. Gee et al., SUBSPECIALIZATION, RECRUITMENT AND RETIREMENT TRENDS OF AMERICAN UROLOGISTS, The Journal of urology, 159(2), 1998, pp. 509-511
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00225347
Volume
159
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
509 - 511
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5347(1998)159:2<509:SRARTO>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Purpose: Trends of urology workforce, subspecialization, recruitment p ractices, retirement planning, practice characteristics and managed ca re impacts in the United States were assessed. Materials and Methods: In February 1996 the executive interviewing branch of The Gallup Organ ization selected randomly and interviewed by telephone 507 practicing urologists in the United States who had provided urological patient ca re for more than 20 hours per week, practiced in 1995 and completed a urological residency program. Results: Several important issues emerge d. Urologists think we may be training too many urologists, subspecial ty board certification would be a divisive issue to urology as a whole and 90% of urologists have an active retirement plan, although 23% ar e not funding the plan fully. Conclusions: The American Urological Ass ociation Gallup Poll, as refined by the Health Policy Survey and Resea rch Committee, continues to be a unique and valuable tool in assessing practice patterns, gathering demographic data and measuring opinions of the American urologist. This information will help us chart our way to the twenty-first century.