Purpose: Trends of urology workforce, subspecialization, recruitment p
ractices, retirement planning, practice characteristics and managed ca
re impacts in the United States were assessed. Materials and Methods:
In February 1996 the executive interviewing branch of The Gallup Organ
ization selected randomly and interviewed by telephone 507 practicing
urologists in the United States who had provided urological patient ca
re for more than 20 hours per week, practiced in 1995 and completed a
urological residency program. Results: Several important issues emerge
d. Urologists think we may be training too many urologists, subspecial
ty board certification would be a divisive issue to urology as a whole
and 90% of urologists have an active retirement plan, although 23% ar
e not funding the plan fully. Conclusions: The American Urological Ass
ociation Gallup Poll, as refined by the Health Policy Survey and Resea
rch Committee, continues to be a unique and valuable tool in assessing
practice patterns, gathering demographic data and measuring opinions
of the American urologist. This information will help us chart our way
to the twenty-first century.