THE MAIN PURPOSE OF THE STUDY was to examine the anti-malodor properti
es of oxidizing lozenges, as compared to breath mints and chewing gum.
Healthy, young adult volunteers (N = 123; mean age 24.5 years) were m
easured for oral malodor-related parameters (whole mouth odor measured
by 2 judges; tongue dorsum posterior odor using the spoon test; volat
ile sulphide levels; salivary levels of cadaverine and putrescine; and
2 versions of an oral rinse test) on the first afternoon of the study
. They were then assigned randomly to one of 6 groups (2 brands of bre
ath mints, chewing gum with no active ingredients, regular and full-st
rength oxidizing lozenges, and a no-treatment control), and instructed
to employ the treatment before bedtime, the next morning, and in the
early afternoon 3 hours prior to measurements, which were carried out
24 hours following baseline measurements. Volunteers also estimated th
e level of their own whole mouth and tongue odors at baseline and post
-treatment. The data showed that, among treatments, only the full-stre
ngth oxidizing lozenge significantly reduced tongue dorsum malodor, as
determined by the spoon test. The full-strength lozenge also yielded
a significant increase in the modified oral rinse test, presumably due
, at least in part, to residual oxidizing activity retained in the ora
l cavity. Self-estimations of whole mouth and tongue malodor by volunt
eers were significantly correlated with corresponding-judge assessment
s, suggesting some degree of objectivity in assessing one's own oral m
alodor.