J. Audrain et al., GENETIC-COUNSELING AND TESTING FOR BREAST-OVARIAN CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY - WHAT DO WOMEN WANT, Journal of clinical oncology, 16(1), 1998, pp. 133-138
Purpose: To assess preferences for the content and process of genetic
counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility among
women at high risk for breast cancer. Methods: Ninety-eight healthy wo
men who had a family history of breast cancer in at least two first-de
gree relatives participated in a structured telephone survey that eval
uated preferences for type of provider and the content and process of
pretest education and posttest genetic counseling. Results: Forty-two
percent of women preferred that pretest education be delivered by a ge
netic counselor, while 22% preferred an oncologist. This preference wa
s positively associated with a desire to discuss psychosocial issues d
uring the session (P = .001), For posttest counseling, 38% of women pr
eferred an oncologist, while 20% preferred a genetic counselor. Howeve
r, women who desired supportive counseling during this session were si
gnificantly more likely to prefer a genetic counselor to an oncologist
(P = .02). Fewer women wished to see a primary care physician or gyne
cologist for pretest education (11%) or posttest counseling (22%). Wit
h regard to the counseling process, 82% of women wished to self-refer
for genetic counseling, but 63% desired advice and recommendations abo
ut whether to be tested. Conclusion: When feasible, the optimal approa
ch may be for oncologists to work with genetic counselors to provide p
retest education and medical recommendations, Elicitation of patients'
preferences may be useful to determine the level of counseling servic
es needed. (C) 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.