Mp. Burton et al., COMPARISON OF HISTOLOGIC STAINS FOR USE IN PCR ANALYSIS OF MICRODISSECTED, PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUES, BioTechniques, 24(1), 1998, pp. 86
We evaluated the effect of six different histologic stains on the prod
uctivity of PCR amplification of DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded t
issue samples. The tissue was collected from glass slides by microdiss
ection techniques, whereby tiny portions of tissue are visually identi
fied through a microscope and selectively resected for subsequent DNA
extraction and PCR amplification. We found that the success of PCR amp
lification depended on the type of histologic stain that was used to f
acilitate microscopic visualization of the undeparaffinized tissue sec
tion. The best results were obtained with methyl green and nuclear fas
t red, while Wright's stain yielded less PCR product. Two other stains
, Evans blue and light-green SF yellowish (also known as the counterst
ain for geomori methenamine silver stain) yielded sufficient PCR produ
cts; however, their staining characteristics did not afford satisfacto
ry visualization of nuclear chromatin to discriminate between benign a
nd malignant cells. Our most significant finding was that a commonly u
sed histologic stain, hematoxylin, failed to produce DNA templates tha
t could be consistently amplified by PCR. In conclusion, it is prudent
to avoid hematoxylin stains when preparing tissues as starting materi
al for PCR. Among the remaining five strains that were evaluated, the
best choice depends on the differential staining characteristics of th
e cells to be dissected.